No Name Brands

Therer just so stupid. Plus we need to buy stuff from who invented it

Well the clothes are made cheaply its just the brand name on it makes it expensive lol

I don't care about labels.

Why do you care about name brands. They don't hurt anyone.

Silver Assassin wrote:They don't hurt anyone.

they hurt a whole lot of african kids in sweatshops, kids who can't afford labels and so get bullied and the business of companies who don't use name brands but have more ethical ways of producing clothes.

Rafiki wrote:

Silver Assassin wrote:They don't hurt anyone.

they hurt a whole lot of african kids in sweatshops, kids who can't afford labels and so get bullied and the business of companies who don't use name brands but have more ethical ways of producing clothes.

We of course to a large extent they hurt a lot of people if you think on a global scale. However in day to day life they only affect a minority. Also the sweatshops are only on a small statistic and it not our fault that sweatshops are used. It is not our duty to close sweatshops and the companies who are linked to sweatshops pay the price.

I don't see anything wrong with them.

Some of the biggest brand names use child labour, so why limit it to no brand lables?

Look at the cocoa industry
Look at the clothing/fashion industries
The majority of call centres big companies use are in India/Pakistan as the labour is so cheap